What Do Lower Conforming Loan Limits Mean To You?

If you’re in the market to buy a home, you know what I am talking about. If you’re in the market to buy a home and you don’t know what I’m talking about – keep reading! It is vital information!

On October 1, 2011, as part of POTUS’ attempt to repair the country’s housing finance system, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be reducing the size of loans eligible for purchase by them, in other words – lowering the conforming loan limits. In high cost areas (like Los Angeles county) this means that they will only be purchasing loans no bigger than $625,000 (dropping it from $729,000).

What does this mean? Politically, it’s a move away from the government-reliant system we have in place today and a step closer to the privatization of the housing market. What does this mean for a homebuyer? Well, if you are looking to purchase a home with a loan in the $625,000 to $729,000 range – your loan will no longer be considered to be "conforming" and will now be "jumbo." Jumbo loans often have higher rates than conforming loans (which means you will pay more interest on this loan). The government is aiming to reduce the risk taken on by these government agencies, by reducing the amounts of the loans eligible for purchase. But for you potential homebuyers, (in this range) you’re potentially looking at bigger payments.

The next impact affecting homebuyers, is the impact on home prices. Although some argue that this reduction will drive up demand (thereby increasing prices) for buyers to buy before the limits drop, that effect will be very short-lived, and it does not take the stringent financing requirements that most lenders have in place today.

Another drawback for homebuyers is the related increase in costs and fees that the Federal Housing Administration will be charging homebuyers looking to use FHA financing (meaning that they want to buy a home with a 3.5% down-payment). It sounds like looking to limit the taxpayers’ risks is also going to cost the taxpayers lots more money.

Distressed Homeowners : You Must Read This!!!

Distressed Homeowners : You Must Read This!!!

This information is being brought to you directly from the California Attorney General’s Website:

SAN FRANCISCO --- Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today announced that the California Department of Justice, in conjunction with the State Bar of California, has sued multiple entities accused of fraudulently taking millions of dollars from thousands of homeowners who were led to believe they would receive relief on their mortgages.

Attorney General Harris sued Philip Kramer, the Law Offices of Kramer & Kaslow, two other law firms, three other lawyers, and 14 other defendants who are accused of working together to defraud homeowners across the country through the deceptive marketing of "mass joinder" lawsuits. "Mass joinder" lawsuits are lawsuits with hundreds, or more, individually named plaintiffs. This is the first consumer action by the Attorney General's Mortgage Fraud Strike Force.

Kramer's firm and other defendants were placed into receivership on Monday, Aug. 15. The legal actions were designed to shut down a scheme operated by attorneys and their marketing partners, in which defendants used false and misleading representations to induce thousands of homeowners into joining the mass joinder lawsuits against their mortgage lenders. Defendants also had their assets seized and were enjoined from continuing their operations. Nineteen DOJ special agents participated as the firms were taken over Wednesday, Aug. 17, along with 42 agents and other personnel from HUD's Office of Inspector General, the California State Bar, and the Office of Receiver Thomas McNamara at 14 locations in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Sixteen bank accounts were seized.

"The defendants in this case fraudulently promised to win prompt mortgage relief for millions of vulnerable homeowners across the country," said Attorney General Harris. "Innocent people, already battered by the housing crisis, were targeted for fraud in their moment of distress."

"The number of lawyers who have tried to take advantage of distressed homeowners in these tough economic times is nothing short of shocking," said State Bar President William Hebert. "By taking over the practices of four attorneys accused of fraudulent marketing practices, the State Bar can put a stop to their deplorable conduct as part of our ongoing effort to protect the public."

It is believed that at least two million pieces of mail were sent out by defendants to victims in at least 17 states. Defendants' revenue from this scam is estimated to be in the millions of dollars.

As alleged in the lawsuit, defendants preyed on desperate homeowners facing foreclosure by selling them participation as plaintiffs in mass joinder lawsuits against mortgage lenders. Defendants deceptively led homeowners to believe that by joining these lawsuits, they would stop pending foreclosures, reduce their loan balances or interest rates, obtain money damages, and even receive title to their homes free and clear of their existing mortgage. Defendants charged homeowners retainer fees of up to $10,000 to join as plaintiffs to a mass joinder lawsuit against their lender or loan servicer.

Consumers who paid to join the mass joinder lawsuits were frequently unable to receive answers to simple questions, such as whether they had been added to the lawsuit, or even to establish contact with defendants. Some consumers lost their homes shortly after paying the retainer fees demanded by defendants.

This mass joinder scam began with deceptive mass mailers, the lawsuit alleges. Some mailers, designed to appear as official settlement notices or government documents, informed homeowners that they were potential plaintiffs in a "national litigation settlement" against their lender. No settlements existed and in many cases no lawsuit had even been filed. Defendants also advertised through their web sites.

When consumers contacted the defendants, they were given legal advice by sales agents, not attorneys, who made additional deceptive statements and provided (often inaccurate) legal advice about the supposedly "likely" results of joining the lawsuits. Defendants unlawfully paid commissions to their sales representatives on a per client sign-up basis, a practice known as "running and capping."

Defendants' alleged misconduct violates the following laws:

-False advertising, in violation of section 17500 of the Business and Professions Code

-Unfair, fraudulent and unlawful business practices, in violation of section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code

-Unlawful running and capping, in violation of section 6152, subdivision (a) of the Business and Professions Code (i.e., a lawyer unlawfully paying a non-lawyer to solicit or procure business)

-Improper fee splitting (defendants unlawfully splitting legal fees with non-attorneys)

-Failing to register with the Department of Justice as a telephonic seller.

Homeowners who have paid to be added to one of the lawsuits should contact the State Bar if they feel they may be victims of this scam. They can also contact a HUD-certified housing counselor for general mortgage related assistance.

The Department of Justice has seized the practices of the following non-attorney defendants:

Attorneys Processing Center, LLC; Data Management, LLC; Gary DiGirolamo; Bill Stephenson; Mitigation Professionals, LLC; Glen Reneau; Pate Marier & Associates, Inc.; James Pate; Ryan Marier; Home Retention Division; Michael Tapia; Lewis Marketing Corp.; Clarence Butt; and Thomas Phanco.

The State Bar has seized the practices and attorney accounts of the attorney defendants:

The Law Offices of Kramer & Kaslow; Philip Kramer, Esq; Mitchell J. Stein & Associates; Mitchell Stein, Esq.; Christopher Van Son, Esq.; Mesa Law Group Corp.; and Paul Petersen, Esq.

Attorney General Harris is challenging the defendants' alleged misconduct in marketing their mass joinder lawsuits; her office takes no position as to the legal merits of any claims asserted in the mass joinder lawsuits filed by defendants.

Victims in the following states are known to have received these mailers, or signed on to join the case. This is a preliminary list that may be updated:

Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Texas, Washington

The complaint, temporary restraining order, examples of marketing documents and photos of the enforcement action are available with the electronic version of this release at http://oag.ca.gov/news.

For more information, please visit:

http://oag.ca.gov/news/press_release?id=2552

Helpful Tips To Guide You In Buying Your First Home

Buying a home can be very exciting! It’s part of the "dream" we all have for ourselves, the marriage, the family, the pet, the white picket fence – all of these things are dependent on having a home. Having means owning, not renting; to those of us wishing to make the most of our hard-earned money. But making the most of your money is not always easy – it takes a little bit of savvy and a lot of consideration.

Consideration means research, research and some more research. You need to know the facts. Not just about the home you are buying, but also the city, community, history and future projections, to help you determine whether this investment is right for you. While buying a home is not permanent – it is long term and you need to make sure the home you select matches your long-term lifestyle choices.

Budgeting – this is key! You do not want to get yourself into a home you cannot comfortably afford, or you will end up working and never being home to enjoy it; or unfortunately even potentially risking losing it or other valuable items in your life.

•Get familiar with home buying terminology. Know the difference between the types of loans, insurance, interest rates and programs available to you.

•Figure out your budget. Work with your loan consultant to determine what you can actually afford to pay on a monthly basis. Remember, a mortgage payment is not just principal and interest, there are taxes and insurance that will need to be paid. Also, the community you select a home in may have a homeowner’s association that charges a monthly fee. These are all in addition to the increased utilities, maintenance and potentially security costs that go along with owning a home. Remember, there no "super" to call when that toilet gets clogged!

•Get rid of your old bills! You’ll have lots of new bills to replace those! Try to pay off all your existing credit card bills. The less debt you have, the better loan you will qualify for.

• Read your paper work. HUD has a handy booklet on its site called "Buying Your Home: Settlement Costs and Helpful Information." It describes the home buying and settlement process and explains most of the expenses you will encounter. Although your lender will give you a copy, it’s a good idea to read it before you even consider applying for a loan.

• Ask questions. Make sure your loan and real estate consultants are the kind of people who take the time to explain every single step of the process and answer each of your questions. They are there to serve YOU! Buying a home is a serious decision and the people helping you should appreciate the opportunity to serve you. The service you receive should be attentive, respectful and consistent!

 

For more information, please visit www.crestico.com.

The American Dream: Home Ownership

The National Association of Home Builders ("NAHB") recently reported that Americans still believe in home ownership.

Americans still believe that a strong housing industry means more jobs and more money to keep local economies growing, and that the government should continue to promote homeownership through tax incentives.

A new survey found that nearly three out of four American voters—73 percent—believe that it is reasonable and appropriate for the federal government to provide tax incentives to promote homeownership.

And 81 percent of voters are convinced we should do more to improve the housing finance system because we need policies that encourage homeownership if we want to rebuild the middle class.

"Every new single-family home built creates three full-time jobs and increases the property tax base that supports local schools," said National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Chairman Bob Nielsen, a home builder from Reno, Nev. "The American public recognizes that to restore the health of the economy, we need policies that support opportunities for homeownership."

The poll, which was conducted on behalf of NAHB, also found that an overwhelming majority of respondents oppose eliminating the mortgage interest deduction and would be less likely to support a candidate for Congress who wants to do away with this vital tax incentive.

"Despite the current housing downturn, Americans still see homeownership as a key building block of being in the middle class and creating strong jobs in their communities," said Celinda Lake, president of Lake Research Partners, which conducted the survey along with Public Opinion Strategies.

Other key survey findings include:

•75 percent of voters say that owning a home is the best long term investment they can make.

•73 percent of voters who do not now own a home say that it is a goal of theirs to eventually buy a home.

•Among voters who are aware of proposals under consideration by Washington policymakers to raise the down payment requirements for a home loan, 92 percent believe it will make it more difficult to buy a home.

Neil Newhouse, partner and co-founder of Public Opinion Strategies, said, "The administration and some in Congress are floating plans to curtail or even abolish the mortgage interest deduction and impose changes that would make it much more difficult and expensive to get a home loan. This is in direct opposition to the views of most Americans, who want the government to encourage growth in the housing market and to maintain tax incentives to keep housing affordable."

http://www.nahb.org/generic.aspx?sectionID=1047&genericContentID=162180

 

For more information, please visit www.crestico.com.